Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Amsterdam, averaging −5.4%. The biggest cut was € 400.000 (Bloemgracht 129 AH, Amsterdam). Last updated 17 September.
All houses dropping in price in Amsterdam →House prices and market figures in Amsterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-2.8%
For sale-2.4%
For sale-2.5%
For sale-5.7%
For sale-5.0%
For sale-2.1%
For sale-4.8%
For sale-4.8%
For sale-6.3%
For sale-5.3%
For sale-5.5%
For sale-12.2%
For sale-6.8%
For sale-1.8%
For sale-3.4%
For sale-6.5%
For sale-4.1%
For sale-9.1%
For sale-7.4%
For sale-4.5%
For sale-1.3%
For sale-7.1%
For sale-7.3%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Haarlemmerdijk 139 A
Apartment at Haarlemmerdijk 139A in Amsterdam (Haarlemmerbuurt-West neighbourhood). The home was built in 1997 and has 90 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Centraal (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Montessori Basisschool de Eilanden (480 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 850,000−€ 45,000
- Off Funda3 days ago
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 895,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 13.8% With children−17.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 62.5% Single-person+22.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23.7% Other multi-person−4.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 25% Owner-occupied−32 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44% Social housing+16 pt vs the Netherlands
- 31% Private rental+17 pt vs the Netherlands
- 51.5% Dutch background−20.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 19.5% Rest of Europe+10.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 29% Outside Europe+10.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.5% Lower−7.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 24.1% Intermediate−16.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 57.3% Higher+24 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Haarlemmerbuurt-West neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
347 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 40.2% Theft / burglary+1.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13% Other−20.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.5% Violence and threats+1.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.6% Vandalismsame as the Netherlands
- 26.6% Public order+17.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: excellent
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
300 permits within 500 m · 6 construction plans within 1 km · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
55th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 34% of schools
89th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
79th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 0% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 2% of schools
31st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 366 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 58% of schools
19th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
60th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
91st percentile: high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
38th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
4th percentile: low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.