Price drops in and around Landgraaf
More homes in and around Landgraaf whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Heigank 58
Terraced house at Heigank 58 in Landgraaf (Oud Nieuwenhagen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1924 and has 197 m² of living space, a 360 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Eygelshoven Markt (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool 'T Valder (502 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer13 Jul 2026
- Relisted17 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 197 m²
- Plot
- 360 m²
- Construction year
- 1924
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 389,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Nieuwenhagen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Experienced health (very) good (neighbourhood)
- clearly below national average64.7%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.29 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share25.2%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot236 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average38%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space95 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,829 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,025 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 295,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.3%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.599 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 construction plans within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
42nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
88th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
75th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
46th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
24th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 278 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
94th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.