Price drops in and around Hilversum
More homes in and around Hilversum whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Hilversum, averaging −5.3%. The biggest cut was € 200.000 (Zevenenderdrift 4, Laren (NH)). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Hilversum →House prices and market figures in Hilversum →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Hoge Larenseweg 43 C
Apartment at Hoge Larenseweg 43C in Hilversum (Geuzenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1900 and has 74 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Hilversum (434 m). The nearest primary school is Sterrenschool Hilversum (160 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedyesterday€ 350,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale7 Aug 2026€ 385,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 29.2% With children−2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47.2% Single-person+7.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23.6% Other multi-person−4.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 67% Owner-occupied+10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10% Social housing−18 pt vs the Netherlands
- 24% Private rental+10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 57.4% Dutch background−14.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16% Rest of Europe+6.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26.4% Outside Europe+7.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 20% Lower−6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38.4% Intermediate−2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 41.6% Higher+8.3 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Geuzenbuurt neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
93 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 27.5% Theft / burglary−11.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 28.6% Other−4.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16.5% Violence and threats+6.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.1% Vandalism+3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15.4% Public order+6.7 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
212 permits within 500 m · 89 construction plans within 1 km · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
62nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
89th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 344 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 5 pupils · total 73 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 785 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 101 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 218 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 403 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 12% of schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 93 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
48th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
33rd percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 55 exam candidates
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
79th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
75th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 129 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
19th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 68 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

