Price drops in and around Landgraaf
More homes in and around Landgraaf whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hoofdstraat 336
Semi-detached at Hoofdstraat 336 in Landgraaf (Eiske neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 174 m² of living space, a 257 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Landgraaf (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is De Harlekijn (391 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 510,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 174 m²
- Plot
- 257 m²
- Construction year
- 2007
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 536,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Eiske, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21.5%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High20.5%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.4%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot75 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels46%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space161 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential11,435 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,016 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 295,000
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
46th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
66th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
60th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
100th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 356 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
41st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 278 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
11th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 47 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.