Price drops in and around Spijkenisse
More homes in and around Spijkenisse whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/07/2026 | Karel Doormanstraat 382 N Rotterdam | € 585.000 € 559.000 | -4.4% | 93 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Ellewoutsdijkstraat 214 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 122 m²109 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Mgr. W.M. Bekkerslaan 14 Maassluis | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 85 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Ruilstraat 4 A Rotterdam | € 395.500 € 375.000 | -5.2% | 68 m²60 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 145 Schiedam | € 400.000 € 389.000 | -2.8% | 89 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Calandstraat 39 F Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 438.000 | -2.7% | 48 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Roemeensestraat 12 A01 Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 76 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Prins Alexanderlaan 10 Vlaardingen | € 1.675.000 € 1.495.000 | -10.8% | 291 m²950 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | 1e Middellandstraat 59 A Rotterdam | € 495.000 € 450.000 | -9.1% | 110 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Wilhelmina Hofman-Pootstraat 56 Spijkenisse | € 650.000 € 600.000 | -7.7% | 170 m²324 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | van Hogendorplaan 332 Vlaardingen | € 289.500 € 275.000 | -5.0% | 67 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Boerhaavelaan 51 B Schiedam | € 185.000 € 150.000 | -18.9% | 56 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Mathenesserweg 41 A Rotterdam | € 269.000 € 264.000 | -1.9% | 63 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Burgemeester Gijsenlaan 36 Schiedam | € 225.000 € 210.000 | -6.7% | 45 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Falernogaard 1 Spijkenisse | € 390.000 € 365.000 | -6.4% | 102 m²203 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Westerstraat 18 K Rotterdam | € 550.000 € 520.000 | -5.5% | 103 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | De Quackstraat 52 C Rotterdam | € 295.000 € 275.000 | -6.8% | 92 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Witte de Withstraat 19 C Rotterdam | € 389.000 € 349.000 | -10.3% | 65 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Mendelssohnplein 15 D Vlaardingen | € 289.000 € 279.500 | -3.3% | 86 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van 's-Gravesandestraat 26 B Schiedam | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 99 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
J. Sasboutstraat 36
Semi-detached at J. Sasboutstraat 36 in Spijkenisse (Centrum-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 110 m² of living space, a 129 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Spijkenisse Centrum (417 m). The nearest primary school is Marimba Groenewoud (640 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 360,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale12 Jun 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 110 m²
- Plot
- 129 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 300,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Centrum-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable16%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Liveability classⓘ
- Weakweak
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.2183 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.125 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share24.2%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High23.3%
- Overweight (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much higher than average61.1%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away18.5 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Far away10.2 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Station very far away16 km
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime145 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)76.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)65.3%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance9.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside36.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors43.8%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Very deep (above 2 m)3.44 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels8%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)901 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)99 m
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby14.5 km
- Estimated sun hours (winter)ⓘ
- Virtually no winter sun0.5 hour
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.1%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.1%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated3.1%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.8 µg/kg
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot73 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space70 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical670 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential5,130 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,047 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values10.1%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
35th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 62: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 66: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 55 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 21% of schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 57% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 219 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
85th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
66th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
36th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.