Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jean Sibeliusstraat 24
Semi-detached at Jean Sibeliusstraat 24 in Rotterdam (Zevenkamp neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 105 m² of living space, a 194 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Nieuw Verlaat (273 m). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke BasisschoolDe Nessevliet (495 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced6 Jul 2026€ 469,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 485,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Plot
- 194 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 439,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold (leasehold end date: 30-06-2056)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zevenkamp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.9%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away10.7 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated100 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place8.07 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot129 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space89 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,225 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
70th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
64th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 20% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
41st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.