Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Juliana van Stolberglaan 75 B
Home at Juliana van Stolberglaan 75 in Rotterdam (Hillegersberg Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1927 and has 75 m² of living space, a 249 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (411 m). The nearest primary school is De Bergse Zonnebloem (134 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 345,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale12 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Plot
- 249 m²
- Construction year
- 1927
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 348,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillegersberg Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Poor (label F/G)354 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorF
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport3 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Building coverage percentageⓘ
- Plenty of open land30%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Very spacious plot174 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space103 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential7,219 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.133 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
24 permits within 500 m · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 67 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.