Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Katendrechtse Lagedijk 369 C
Home at Katendrechtse Lagedijk 369 in Rotterdam (Carnisse neighbourhood). The home has 105 m² of living space, a 133 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Zuidplein (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is basisschool Wereldwijs (148 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Plot
- 133 m²
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 239,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Carnisse, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance11.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space112 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical750 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential7,972 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,017 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.038 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away19.9 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)23.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 81 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
47th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 67 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 301 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 285 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 344 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.