Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Korendijk 21
Apartment at Korendijk 21 in Rotterdam (Groot IJsselmonde neighbourhood). The home was built in 2006 and has 82 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Lombardijen (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum IJsselmonde (196 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)17 Jul 2026
- Price reduced3 Jul 2026€ 275,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 289,000
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Construction year
- 2006
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 340,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Groot IJsselmonde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,675 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)154 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical600 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.876 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 133 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no recent test score · total 80 pupils
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 357 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 508 pupils
Disadvantage score 177 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 294 pupils
Disadvantage score 100 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
14th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 42 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
83rd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 37 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 51 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 131 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 36 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.