Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kralingse Plaslaan 132
Apartment at Kralingse Plaslaan 132 in Rotterdam (Kralingen West neighbourhood). The home was built in 1937 and has 53 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Gerdesiaweg (756 m). The nearest primary school is Arentschool (306 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)20 Jul 2026
- Under offer7 Jul 2026
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 53 m²
- Construction year
- 1937
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 316,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kralingen West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot955 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)111 kWh/m²/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.955 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away20.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
84th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
45th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 221 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.