Price drops in and around Alkmaar
More homes in and around Alkmaar whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Alkmaar, averaging −4.4%. The biggest cut was € 200.000 (Banweg 2, Egmond aan den Hoef). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Alkmaar →House prices and market figures in Alkmaar →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-4.3%
For sale-2.8%
For sale-2.3%
For sale-8.7%
For sale-1.3%
For sale-5.7%
For sale-5.9%
For sale-2.1%
For sale-1.9%
For sale-5.0%
For sale-5.7%
For sale-2.2%
For sale-2.1%
For sale-4.3%
For sale-9.6%
For sale-6.6%
For sale-5.3%
For sale-4.8%
For sale-6.0%
For sale-1.9%
For sale-4.0%
For sale-6.7%
For sale-4.3%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Lamoraalstraat 4
Semi-detached at Lamoraalstraat 4 in Alkmaar (Nassaukwartier en Hout neighbourhood). The home was built in 1922 and has 141 m² of living space, a 122 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Alkmaar (767 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Kring (270 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- For saleyesterday
- Price reducedyesterday€ 750,000−€ 45,000
- Off Funda12 days ago
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 795,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 33.1% With children+1.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 37.9% Single-person−2.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 29% Other multi-personsame as the Netherlands
- 78% Owner-occupied+21 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5% Social housing−23 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16% Private rental+2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 83.8% Dutch background+11.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 7% Rest of Europe−2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.9% Outside Europe−9.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.9% Lower−7.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 29.9% Intermediate−10.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 51.2% Higher+17.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Nassaukwartier en Hout neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
125 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 35.3% Theft / burglary−3.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 36.1% Other+2.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.6% Violence and threats+2.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.8% Vandalism+2.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 4.2% Public order−4.5 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: excellent
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
235 permits within 500 m · 14 construction plans within 1 km · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 623 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 59 pupils
Disadvantage score 14: more disadvantage than 51% of schools
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 124 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 478 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 404 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
32nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 102 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
22nd percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 75 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 112 exam candidates
83rd percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
55th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
89th percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 123 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
27th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 251 exam candidates
56th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 51 exam candidates
86th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 39 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.