Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Rotterdam, averaging −5.5%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Calandstraat 20 E, Rotterdam). Last updated 15 September.
All houses dropping in price in Rotterdam →House prices and market figures in Rotterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Lange Hilleweg 13 A02
Apartment at Lange Hilleweg 13A-02 in Rotterdam (Bloemhof neighbourhood). The home was built in 1924 and has 114 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Maashaven (743 m). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Blijvliet (145 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 325,000−€ 24,000
- Off Funda13 days ago
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 349,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 33.8% With children+2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47.9% Single-person+7.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.3% Other multi-person−10.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 17% Owner-occupied−40 pt vs the Netherlands
- 60% Social housing+32 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23% Private rental+9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 20.9% Dutch background−51.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15.1% Rest of Europe+5.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 64% Outside Europe+45.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47.1% Lower+21.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38.9% Intermediate−1.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 14% Higher−19.3 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Bloemhof neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
862 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 24.1% Theft / burglary−14.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44.8% Other+11.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15.4% Violence and threats+5.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.7% Vandalism+2.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 4.1% Public order−4.6 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: weak
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
99 permits within 500 m · 171 construction plans within 1 km · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
73rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
51st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
35th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
30th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 93: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
47th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
62nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
87th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
95th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

