Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Rotterdam, averaging −5.2%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Calandstraat 20 E, Rotterdam). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Rotterdam →House prices and market figures in Rotterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Duyvesteynstraat 17 A
Apartment at Duyvesteynstraat 17A in Rotterdam (Kleinpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 1955 and has 142 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Centrum (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Albert Schweitzer (295 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 515,000−€ 34,000
- Listed for sale11 Jul 2026€ 549,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 34.7% With children+3.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47.5% Single-person+7.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 17.8% Other multi-person−10.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 29% Owner-occupied−28 pt vs the Netherlands
- 62% Social housing+34 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9% Private rental−5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 40.5% Dutch background−31.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 7.9% Rest of Europe−1.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 51.6% Outside Europe+33.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 37.5% Lower+11.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38.8% Intermediate−1.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23.7% Higher−9.6 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Kleinpolder neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
476 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 35.9% Theft / burglary−3.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38.7% Other+5.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13.3% Violence and threats+3.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6% Vandalism−3.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6% Public order−2.7 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
72 permits within 500 m · 98 construction plans within 1 km · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 121 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 90: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
14th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
65th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
48th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

