Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Rotterdam, averaging −5.2%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Calandstraat 20 E, Rotterdam). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Rotterdam →House prices and market figures in Rotterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Oranjeboomstraat 26 B
Terraced house at Oranjeboomstraat 26B in Rotterdam (Feijenoord neighbourhood). The home was built in 2022 and has 173 m² of living space, a 30 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Wilhelminaplein (851 m). The nearest primary school is De Nieuwe Haven (488 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 850,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 875,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 38.4% With children+6.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44.9% Single-person+4.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16.7% Other multi-person−11.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13% Owner-occupied−44 pt vs the Netherlands
- 84% Social housing+56 pt vs the Netherlands
- 2% Private rental−12 pt vs the Netherlands
- 19.6% Dutch background−52.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.1% Rest of Europe−1.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 72.4% Outside Europe+53.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 41.8% Lower+15.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 35.8% Intermediate−4.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22.5% Higher−10.8 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Feijenoord neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
449 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 35.9% Theft / burglary−3.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38.2% Other+5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.9% Violence and threats+1.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.2% Vandalism+2.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 2.7% Public order−6 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: weak
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
100 permits within 500 m · 7 construction plans within 1 km · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 82: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 105: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
67th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
89th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 577 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
62nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
47th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
5th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

