Price drops in and around Capelle aan den IJssel
More homes in and around Capelle aan den IJssel whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lemelerberg 140
Apartment at Lemelerberg 140 in Capelle aan den IJssel (Bergenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1978 and has 83 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is De Terp (296 m). The nearest primary school is Pieter Bas (167 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)23 Jun 2026
- Price reduced4 Jun 2026€ 335,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 83 m²
- Construction year
- 1978
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 332,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bergenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.8%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away11.1 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.2
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated210 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1353 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot10,866 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)160 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.75 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 106 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 407 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 355 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 78 pupils · total 771 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · PRO
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 434 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 172 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.