Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Librijesteeg 301
Apartment at Librijesteeg 301 in Rotterdam (Stadsdriehoek neighbourhood). The home was built in 2003 and has 83 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Blaak (320 m). The nearest primary school is Willibrord (339 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced8 Jul 2026€ 449,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 83 m²
- Construction year
- 2003
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 479,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 28-02-2099)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadsdriehoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)226 m
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- very nearby227 m
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Very close to railway40 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot1,639 m²
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.183 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away20.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.