Price drops in and around Capelle aan den IJssel
More homes in and around Capelle aan den IJssel whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Gedenklaan 25 Gouda | € 620.000 € 600.000 | -3.2% | 134 m²188 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Nieuwehaven 51 a Gouda | € 549.000 € 495.000 | -9.8% | 128 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Wachtelstraat 25 Gouda | € 415.000 € 385.000 | -7.2% | 103 m²75 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Von Lindernstraat 19 Alblasserdam | € 365.000 € 350.000 | -4.1% | 74 m²148 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Stoofsteeg 4 c Gouda | € 425.000 € 398.000 | -6.3% | 78 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Graaf van Bloisstraat 86 Gouda | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 69 m²67 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lino 5
Terraced house at Lino 5 in Capelle aan den IJssel (Schildersvormenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 115 m² of living space, a 105 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Capelle Schollevaar (824 m). The nearest primary school is De Contrabas (963 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced13 Jul 2026€ 487,000−€ 12,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 499,000
Property details
- Living area
- 115 m²
- Plot
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 443,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schildersvormenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture areaⓘ
- Greenhouses very nearby465 m
- Within indicative high-voltage magnetic field zoneⓘ
- Within magnetic field zoneYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)82,830 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Voltage level near high-voltage lineⓘ
- National transport line (widest zone)380 kV
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside43.5%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away11.2 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot56 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space62 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)129 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,330 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,001 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 78 pupils · total 771 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 440 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 110 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
80th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 106 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 131 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
89th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
no exam results · PRO
39th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 434 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.