Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lloydkade 849
Apartment at Lloydkade 849 in Rotterdam (Schiemond neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 107 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Coolhaven (894 m). The nearest primary school is Delfshaven (417 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)20 Jul 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 595,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 625,000
Property details
- Living area
- 107 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 607,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schiemond, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)483 m
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.3%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,270 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical120 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.133 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)25.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 19 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.