Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Mathenesserdijk 55 B01
Home at Mathenesserdijk 55 in Rotterdam (Spangen neighbourhood). The home has 53 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Marconiplein (203 m). The nearest primary school is Mariaschool Taandersplein (247 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Jul 2026€ 252,500−€ 7,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 260,000
Property details
- Living area
- 53 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 270,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Spangen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby14
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space106 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)188 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,414 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.342 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 102 pupils · total 864 pupils
Disadvantage score 156 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 121 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
65th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
48th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.