Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Mijnsherenlaan 121 A02
Home at Mijnsherenlaan 121 in Rotterdam (Tarwewijk neighbourhood). The home has 89 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Maashaven (490 m). The nearest primary school is Globe (170 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jun 2026€ 279,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 295,000
Property details
- Living area
- 89 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 241,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tarwewijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside28.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors30.7%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty11.2%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High20.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space81 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,787 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,018 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.009 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 404 pupils
Disadvantage score 116 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VWO
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.