Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Amsterdam, averaging −5.4%. The biggest cut was € 400.000 (Bloemgracht 129 AH, Amsterdam). Last updated 17 September.
All houses dropping in price in Amsterdam →House prices and market figures in Amsterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Nachtwachtlaan 480
Apartment at Nachtwachtlaan 480 in Amsterdam (Rembrandtpark-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1974 and has 100 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (652 m). The nearest primary school is OBS de Toekomst (335 m).
estimate€ 425,000
overbidding€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relisted6 days ago€ 695,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale21 Jun 2026€ 715,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 15.4% With children−16.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 53.8% Single-person+13.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 30.8% Other multi-person+2.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 56% Owner-occupied−1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 0% Social housing−28 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44% Private rental+30 pt vs the Netherlands
- 37.1% Dutch background−35 pt vs the Netherlands
- 30.3% Rest of Europe+21 pt vs the Netherlands
- 32% Outside Europe+13.5 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Rembrandtpark-Zuid neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
63 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 50.9% Theft / burglary+11.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26.4% Other−6.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13.2% Violence and threats+3.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5.7% Vandalism−3.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 3.8% Public order−4.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: very good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits within 500 m · 66 construction plans within 1 km · 42 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
3rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
34th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
91st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
87th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile: low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
5th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
66th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
56th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
72nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

