Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Oostmaaslaan 232
Apartment at Oostmaaslaan 232 in Rotterdam (Struisenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1977 and has 71 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Voorschoterlaan (990 m). The nearest primary school is Nieuwe Park Rozenburgschool (504 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 375,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 71 m²
- Construction year
- 1977
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 315,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Struisenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside31.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.5%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park42 m
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Net labour participation
- Low56%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot7,001 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)106 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical180 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.891 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)25.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 577 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 105 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 82 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
28th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 221 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.