Price drops in and around Landgraaf
More homes in and around Landgraaf whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Op de Heugden 48
Semi-detached at Op de Heugden 48 in Landgraaf (Lichtenberg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1923 and has 240 m² of living space, a 415 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Landgraaf (391 m). The nearest primary school is OBS Wereldwijs (457 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 279,000−€ 20,000
- Sold10 Jun 2026€ 299,000
Property details
- Living area
- 240 m²
- Plot
- 415 m²
- Construction year
- 1923
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 297,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lichtenberg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Noise load
- Loud66 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land23%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot320 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels41%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space116 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,223 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,017 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 295,000
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 8 construction plans within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
62nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
42nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
46th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
60th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
78th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 278 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
15th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
94th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.