Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Regenboogkade 125
Apartment at Regenboogkade 125 in Rotterdam (Oud IJsselmonde neighbourhood). The home was built in 1993 and has 104 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is 's-Gravenweg (1.9 km). The nearest primary school is Meester Baars (1.2 km).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 399,500−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 409,500
Property details
- Living area
- 104 m²
- Construction year
- 1993
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 410,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 18-02-2091)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud IJsselmonde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant324,000 i.e.
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.4 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.57 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot583 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)127 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.772 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away15.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 6% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 294 pupils
Disadvantage score 100 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 508 pupils
Disadvantage score 177 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 629 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
no recent test score · total 80 pupils
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 286 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
83rd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 37 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 42 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
87th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 79 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 434 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 244 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 172 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.