Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Riebeekstraat 12 B
Home at Riebeekstraat 12 in Rotterdam (Afrikaanderwijk neighbourhood). The home has 118 m² of living space, a 106 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Zuid (516 m). The nearest primary school is Sterrenschool De Globetrotter (169 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jun 2026€ 389,000−€ 11,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 118 m²
- Plot
- 106 m²
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 317,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Afrikaanderwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space91 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)158 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical420 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,366 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.