Price drops in and around Geervliet
More homes in and around Geervliet whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Roosendaelweg 17
Terraced house at Roosendaelweg 17 in Geervliet (Geervliet-Noordoost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1985 and has 103 m² of living space, a 152 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is De Akkers (5.3 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Markenburg (241 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jun 2026€ 459,500−€ 15,500
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Plot
- 152 m²
- Construction year
- 1985
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 356,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Geervliet-Noordoost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Very close (<500 m)440 m
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Very close (<50 m)50 m
- Serious noise nuisance from wind turbines (neighbourhood)
- Strong turbine noise15.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby43
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot91 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average40%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space75 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)156 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,456 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
83rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 101 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
97th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 77 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 2% of schools
94th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 262 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
98th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 406 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 446 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 55 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
56th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
66th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO
no exam results · PRO
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 31 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.