Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Rusthoflaan 63 B
Apartment at Rusthoflaan 63B in Rotterdam (Oud Crooswijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1924 and has 50 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Gerdesiaweg (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is KC Talma (31 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced17 Jun 2026€ 385,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 50 m²
- Construction year
- 1924
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Crooswijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.5%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot275 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)61 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.089 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 25 construction plans within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
84th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.