Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Steigerstraat 16
Terraced house at Steigerstraat 16 in 's-Gravenhage (Vissershaven neighbourhood). The home was built in 2018 and has 231 mΒ² of living space, a 160 mΒ² plot, 7 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (4.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Tweemaster (595 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026β¬ 1,275,000ββ¬ 75,000
- Listed for sale18 Jun 2026β¬ 1,350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 231 mΒ²
- Plot
- 160 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 2018
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 7
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- β¬ 1,100,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vissershaven, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1154 score
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.6 km
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.59 ratio
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime87.8 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)16%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure13
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 Β°C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up100%
- Unbuilt plot area
- Almost completely built up0 mΒ²
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)934 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.7 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Large treatment plant244,800 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.7%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.1 Β°C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average55.8%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated COβ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space84 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)89 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 mΒ³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,121 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,042 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits within 500 m Β· 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
16th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 8 pupils Β· total 71 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
28th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 80: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
94th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 47 pupils Β· total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 238 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 29 pupils Β· total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile: high Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 52 pupils Β· total 378 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 52 exam candidates
45th percentile: average Β· 96% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO Β· 22 exam candidates
28th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 103 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
77th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 87 exam candidates
34th percentile: average Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 161 exam candidates
34th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 142 exam candidates
99th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 7.0 Β· VWO Β· 114 exam candidates
9th percentile: low Β· 87% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 116 exam candidates
18th percentile: low Β· 87% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 171 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.