Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Tapstraat 8
Terraced house at Tapstraat 8 in Rotterdam (Feijenoord neighbourhood). The home was built in 2020 and has 144 m² of living space, a 116 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Wilhelminaplein (939 m). The nearest primary school is De Nieuwe Haven (562 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)12 Jul 2026
- Price reduced19 Jun 2026€ 725,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 745,000
Property details
- Living area
- 144 m²
- Plot
- 116 m²
- Construction year
- 2020
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 720,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Feijenoord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby74 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space62 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,937 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 82 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 105 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 577 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.