Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van der Hoevenplein 181
Apartment at Van der Hoevenplein 181 in Rotterdam (Kop van Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 103 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Wilhelminaplein (418 m). The nearest primary school is De Schalm (674 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 730,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 750,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 659,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kop van Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)388 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery2%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area20
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,760 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions11 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)54 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical10 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.016 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)24.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.