Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wijnbrugstraat 75
Apartment at Wijnbrugstraat 75 in Rotterdam (Stadsdriehoek neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 110 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Blaak (333 m). The nearest primary school is Willibrord (321 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced12 Jun 2026€ 600,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 597,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 20-02-2101)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadsdriehoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby14
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside29.5%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors34.7%
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Green share within 500 mⓘ
- Little greenery4%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated335 persons
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,560 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions17 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)87 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.958 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away20.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.