Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zeemansstraat 5 A
Home at Zeemansstraat 5 in Rotterdam (Nieuwe Werk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1938 and has 83 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Leuvehaven (903 m). The nearest primary school is De Schalm (681 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted14 Jul 2026€ 625,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 83 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1938
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 527,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuwe Werk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby20
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby9
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside41.3%
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space221 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical100 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential14,034 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.966 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away20.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
27th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.