Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zevenkampse Ring 378
Apartment at Zevenkampse Ring 378 in Rotterdam (Zevenkamp neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Ambachtsland (276 m). The nearest primary school is De Waterlelie (296 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 327,000
- Ownership
- See deed
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zevenkamp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.9%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity71
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away10.7 km
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,760 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions13 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)65 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.896 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 71 construction plans within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
41st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
70th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 78 pupils · total 771 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 110 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.