Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
1e Pijnackerstraat 95 A
Home at 1e Pijnackerstraat 95 in Rotterdam (Oude Noorden neighbourhood). The home has 57 m² of living space, a 103 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (890 m). The nearest primary school is Prinses Julianaschool (206 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)3 Jul 2026
- Relisted24 Jun 2026€ 475,000−€ 10,000
- Relisted22 Jun 2026€ 485,000+€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 57 m²
- Plot
- 103 m²
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 480,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oude Noorden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport3.9 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside32.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space91 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical540 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,363 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.152 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
44 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
69th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.