Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Beijerlandselaan 5 B02
Home at Beijerlandselaan 5 in Rotterdam (Hillesluis neighbourhood). The home has 101 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Zuid (661 m). The nearest primary school is De Gouden Griffel (267 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 36,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 435,000
Property details
- Living area
- 101 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 240,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillesluis, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.2%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space93 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)144 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,513 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,001 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.014 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.