Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Beverstraat 198
Terraced house at Beverstraat 198 in Rotterdam (Hillesluis neighbourhood). The home was built in 1997 and has 121 m² of living space, a 102 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Stadion (476 m). The nearest primary school is Johan Bogermanschool voor Basisonderwijs (190 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced12 Jun 2026€ 385,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 395,000
Property details
- Living area
- 121 m²
- Plot
- 102 m²
- Construction year
- 1997
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 390,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillesluis, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable18%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30.6%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space44 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)127 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,495 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,001 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.