Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Boompjes 367
Apartment at Boompjes 367 in Rotterdam (Stadsdriehoek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1988 and has 76 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Leuvehaven (268 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Het Landje (465 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 459,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 469,000
Property details
- Living area
- 76 m²
- Construction year
- 1988
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 479,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 19-05-2085)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadsdriehoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)405 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)18,750 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside29.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.7%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,568 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.123 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away20.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)25.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
27th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.