Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Capelseweg 534
Semi-detached at Capelseweg 534 in Rotterdam (Oosterflank neighbourhood). The home was built in 1934 and has 122 m² of living space, a 340 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Prinsenlaan (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Catamaran (457 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced14 Jul 2026€ 675,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 695,000
Property details
- Living area
- 122 m²
- Plot
- 340 m²
- Construction year
- 1934
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 594,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oosterflank, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable15%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental58%
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land26%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot252 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space84 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical10 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,916 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 110 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
63rd percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 78 pupils · total 771 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.