Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
-1.8%
-9.8%
-6.5%
-3.0%
-3.9%
-2.6%
-9.1%
-3.7%
-6.7%
-1.6%
-4.5%
-4.6%
-4.5%
-2.0%
-5.1%
-4.3%
-6.5%
-4.9%
-2.6%
-3.6%
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Francis Picabiastraat 85
Terraced house at Francis Picabiastraat 85 in Rotterdam (Nesselande neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 104 m² of living space, a 94 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Nesselande (555 m). The nearest primary school is Het Tangram (232 m).
Know first, then bid.
Price & status history
- Relisted11 Jun 2026€ 489,000−€ 9,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 498,000
Property details
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Features
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 2 construction plans within 1 km · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
73rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 119 pupils · total 852 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 410 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 13% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 98 pupils · total 668 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 131 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
82nd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
84th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 426 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
39th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
81st percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 64 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
72nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
91st percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 133 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.