Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Francis Picabiastraat 85
Terraced house at Francis Picabiastraat 85 in Rotterdam (Nesselande neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 103 m² of living space, a 94 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Nesselande (555 m). The nearest primary school is Het Tangram (232 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted11 Jun 2026€ 489,000−€ 9,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 498,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Plot
- 94 m²
- Construction year
- 2007
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 479,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nesselande, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture area
- Greenhouses very nearby326 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)387,849 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby38.8 ha
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away12.5 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.3
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average38%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions10 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space57 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)49 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical110 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 119 pupils · total 852 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 410 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 13% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 98 pupils · total 668 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 131 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 426 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
39th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
81st percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 64 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 133 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.