Price drops in and around Geleen
More homes in and around Geleen whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Geleen, averaging −5.2%. The biggest cut was € 200.000 (Kastanjelaan 1, Bunde). Last updated 16 September.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Halewijnstraat 13
Detached at Halewijnstraat 13 in Geleen (Oud-Geleen en Haesselderveld neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 253 m² of living space, a 485 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Geleen Oost (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Driesprong (636 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedyesterday€ 790,000−€ 45,000
- Off Funda2 Sept 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 835,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 25.3% With children−6.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 42.2% Single-person+2.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 32.5% Other multi-person+4.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 62% Owner-occupied+5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26% Social housing−2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12% Private rental−2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 78% Dutch background+5.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10.8% Rest of Europe+1.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.3% Outside Europe−7.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 35.8% Lower+9.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 37.5% Intermediate−3.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26.7% Higher−6.6 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Oud-Geleen en Haesselderveld neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
170 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 31.9% Theft / burglary−7.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 43.4% Other+10.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12% Violence and threats+2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10.8% Vandalism+1.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 1.8% Public order−6.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 155 construction plans within 1 km · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
67th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 487 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 2% of schools
86th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 51% of schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 84 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 57% of schools
42nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 298 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 409 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 54% of schools
64th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 318 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
9th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 283 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
16th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 101 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
96th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · PRO
67th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
87th percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
33rd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO · 214 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 75 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 88 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

