Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hietkamp 79
Apartment at Hietkamp 79 in Rotterdam (Zuidwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1958 and has 64 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Slinge (752 m). The nearest primary school is Steven Stemerdingschool voor Basisonderwijs (218 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)20 Jul 2026
- Under offer13 Jul 2026
- Price reduced5 Jun 2026€ 248,000−€ 7,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 255,000
Property details
- Living area
- 64 m²
- Construction year
- 1958
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 224,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zuidwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)346 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.921 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)21.4 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 379 pupils
Disadvantage score 138 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 302 pupils
Disadvantage score 112 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
77th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 344 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 301 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
43rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 252 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 43% of schools
17th percentile — low · 91% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 23 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.