Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jacob van Akenstraat 102
Apartment at Jacob van Akenstraat 102 in Rotterdam (Het Lage Land neighbourhood). The home was built in 1965 and has 74 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Oosterflank (1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool voor Christelijk Onderwijs Onze Wereld (124 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)6 Jul 2026
- Under offer29 Jun 2026
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 275,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 300,000
Property details
- Living area
- 74 m²
- Construction year
- 1965
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 280,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Het Lage Land, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.7%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.6 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.26 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot913 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.932 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 685 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
63rd percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
no exam results · MAVO
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.