Price drops in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam
More homes in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kardoenhof 53
Apartment at Kardoenhof 53 in Hoogvliet Rotterdam (Hoogvliet Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1974 and has 106 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hoogvliet (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is De Schakel (605 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer10 Jul 2026
- Price reduced13 Jun 2026€ 322,500−€ 2,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 106 m²
- Construction year
- 1974
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 282,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoogvliet Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby29
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away15 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away12.4 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated100 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place6.5 ratio
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,875 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical740 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low2.107 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away25.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)25 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 275 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 426 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 563 pupils
Disadvantage score 97 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 437 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
no exam results · PRO
56th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.