Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Klaprooslaan 117
Apartment at Klaprooslaan 117 in Rotterdam (Schiebroek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1962 and has 62 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Meijersplein / Airport (240 m). The nearest primary school is IKC Wonderwijs (257 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced5 Jun 2026€ 265,000−€ 13,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 278,000
Property details
- Living area
- 62 m²
- Construction year
- 1962
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 256,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schiebroek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture area
- Greenhouses very nearby356 m
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport1.8 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot332 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.018 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away24.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)30.9 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
95th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 92 pupils · total 678 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 330 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 436 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 67 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
78th percentile — high · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 184 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.