Price drops in and around Brunssum
More homes in and around Brunssum whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17/07/2026 | Putstraat 35 Sittard | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 155 m²70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Voortstraat 17 Landgraaf | € 399.000 € 379.500 | -4.9% | 112 m²301 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nieuwenhagerstraat 81 Landgraaf | € 193.000 € 189.000 | -2.1% | 75 m²105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Kampstraat 17 Jabeek | € 319.000 € 299.000 | -6.3% | 123 m²277 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burg. Cremersstraat 21 Nuth | € 519.000 € 498.000 | -4.0% | 153 m²268 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Parmentierstraat 42 Heerlen | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 230 m²558 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Douvenderweg 6 Oirsbeek | € 349.000 € 319.000 | -8.6% | 109 m²299 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Buizerdweg 7 Landgraaf | € 619.500 € 598.000 | -3.5% | 164 m²1030 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Kempenstraat 5 Sittard | € 625.000 € 585.000 | -6.4% | 160 m²478 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Doorvaartstraat 17 Brunssum | € 515.000 € 495.000 | -3.9% | 195 m²294 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Europalaan 1 Heerlen | € 260.000 € 240.000 | -7.7% | 126 m²409 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Burgemeester Henssingel 11 C Valkenburg (LI) | € 399.000 € 379.000 | -5.0% | 112 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Broekstraat 25 5 Sittard | € 325.000 € 299.000 | -8.0% | 121 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Burgemeester Henssingel 11 Valkenburg (LI) | € 295.000 € 275.000 | -6.8% | 66 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Caumerbeeklaan 25 Heerlen | € 349.000 € 329.000 | -5.7% | 142 m²164 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | St.Pieterstraat 264 A Kerkrade | € 187.000 € 179.000 | -4.3% | 65 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Maastrichterweg 2 Landgraaf | € 275.000 € 249.000 | -9.4% | 109 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Kerkstraat 109 Landgraaf | € 275.000 € 249.000 | -9.4% | 131 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Maastrichterweg 2 A Landgraaf | € 215.000 € 175.000 | -18.6% | 67 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Rolduckerstraat 28 Kerkrade | € 229.000 € 219.000 | -4.4% | 98 m²211 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lindeplein 33
Apartment at Lindeplein 33 in Brunssum (Rumpener Beemden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1979 and has 63 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hoensbroek (5 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Caleidoscoop (500 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced23 Jun 2026€ 165,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 175,000
Property details
- Living area
- 63 m²
- Construction year
- 1979
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 164,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rumpener Beemden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.5 km
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Share of households lowest 40% incomeⓘ
- strong concentration of low incomes65.9%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away6.1 km
- Experienced health (very) good (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- clearly below national average59.3%
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot265 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical700 m³
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Far below national average€ 265,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.8%
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.567 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away114.4 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)11.7 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)6.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
99th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 153 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
51st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
46th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 156 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 37% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
76th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 319 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
47th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
79th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 93 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 83 exam candidates
94th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.