Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ossenisseweg 88
Terraced house at Ossenisseweg 88 in Rotterdam (Pendrecht neighbourhood). The home was built in 1958 and has 116 m² of living space, a 114 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Slinge (1 km). The nearest primary school is Beatrixschool (260 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced7 Jul 2026€ 369,500−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 379,500
Property details
- Living area
- 116 m²
- Plot
- 114 m²
- Construction year
- 1958
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 397,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Pendrecht, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.8%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot52 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space67 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical610 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,771 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,017 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 302 pupils
Disadvantage score 112 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
77th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 247 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 384 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 301 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
58th percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
98th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 91% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 23 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.