Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Prins Hendrikkade 83 C
Home at Prins Hendrikkade 83 in Rotterdam (Noordereiland neighbourhood). The home has 54 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Wilhelminaplein (629 m). The nearest primary school is De Pijler (737 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 54 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 267,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Noordereiland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)13,500 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space63 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)160 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,076 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.958 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 82 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 105 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.