Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ringvaartweg 223
Detached at Ringvaartweg 223 in Rotterdam ('s-Gravenland neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 276 m² of living space, a 2,513 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Schenkel (538 m). The nearest primary school is KC De Stelberg (316 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jul 2026€ 1,500,000−€ 200,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,700,000
Property details
- Living area
- 276 m²
- Plot
- 2513 m²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 1,624,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in 's-Gravenland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.6 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.4
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.63 ratio
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-14.4 mm/yr
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land8%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot2,310 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels42%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space298 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)176 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential14,031 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 614 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 629 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 685 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 6% of schools
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 434 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 79 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.