Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
's-Gravendijkwal 91 D
Home at 's-Gravendijkwal 91 in Rotterdam (Middelland neighbourhood). The home was built in 1896 and has 51 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Dijkzigt (382 m). The nearest primary school is KC Het Oude Westen (294 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted7 Jul 2026€ 289,500−€ 10,000
- For sale1 Jul 2026
- Sold (conditional)2 Jun 2026€ 299,500
Property details
- Living area
- 51 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1896
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 281,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Middelland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport5 km
- Noise load
- Loud70 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive62 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby18
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk7.7%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)18,750 per day
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space108 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,579 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.214 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)26.3 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
27th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
40th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 339 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 332 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
no exam results · PRO
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
48th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.