Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schoklandsestraat 3 A
Home at Schoklandsestraat 3 in Rotterdam (Carnisse neighbourhood). The home has 45 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Zuidplein (456 m). The nearest primary school is Chr Basissch De Klaver (409 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer9 Jul 2026
- Price reduced3 Jul 2026€ 195,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale21 Jun 2026€ 205,000
Property details
- Living area
- 45 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 202,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Carnisse, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance11.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside28.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors28.9%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.6%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space118 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential9,641 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,018 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.038 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
14 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 81 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 344 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 301 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 404 pupils
Disadvantage score 116 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
47th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 67 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.